Trial reportJournal of vascular surgery2026
Using precision medicine methods to identify disease stages for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in participants of the BEST-CLI trial.
Trial report in Journal of vascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the most severe form of peripheral artery disease, is associated with a high risk of limb loss. CLTI clinical presentation is highly heterogeneous, ranging from neuropathic ulcers with only mild to moderate ischemia to gangrene resulting from severe ischemia. Understanding the etiology and limb- and systemic-based disease patterns, as well as differential procedural risks and outcomes, is pivotal for making treatment choices over the course of this chronic disease. In other words, accurate staging (and restaging over time) of CLTI that includes limb-based and systemic features is needed to improve the treatment decision-making process and clinical outcomes. Precision medicine analytics can integrate and synthesize multimodal data, in this case anatomy data alongside comorbidities and physical examination findings, offering a more complete staging system from which to make nuanced treatment decisions well-tailored to patient-specific risks.
methodsUsing data from the BEST-CLI (Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia) international randomized controlled trial, we used supervised latent topic modeling to identify clusters of patient features associated with amputation-free survival after stratifying for each assigned revascularization type. Patients were assigned to the cluster they belonged to with highest probability; clusters were characterized by analyzing the characteristics of patients within them. Although the clusters were not naturally ordinal, we subsequently organized them to mirror stages of disease progression for clearer clinical interpretation.
resultsBased on patient- and limb-focused characteristics, we identified three distinct clusters as disease stages. Across the three stages, rates of 2-year mortality were 11.59%, 20.91%, and 24.73% and rates of 2-year amputation-free survival were 83.26%, 70.03%, and 65.82%, respectively, for patients undergoing open bypass. Patients receiving endovascular therapy had 2-year mortality rates of 15.88%, 22.62%, and 20.32% and 2-year amputation-free survival rates of 77.98%, 66.06%, and 67.74%, respectively, for stages 1, 2, and 3. Stage 1 generally included patients who were less likely to have wounds, diabetes, and renal disease. Stage 2 was primarily driven by diabetes and some foot infection. Stage 3 is characterized by high rates of comorbidities, particularly end-stage renal disease and diabetes, as well as higher Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection grades.
conclusionsWe identified three distinct stages of CLTI using precision medicine methods. The results from this analysis of the BEST-CLI randomized clinical trial dataset are consistent with previous findings in other cohorts. Future research focused on tailored treatment algorithms for each specific stage of CLTI is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.