ArticleGynecologic oncology2025
Postmenopausal bleeding: Association of initial place of care with stage at diagnosis for uterine cancer.
Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveUterine cancer has no routine screening. Early diagnosis requires timely/appropriate evaluation of symptoms - most commonly postmenopausal bleeding (PMB). We examined initial place of care for PMB and its association with uterine cancer stage at diagnosis.
methodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database with linked American Medical Association Physician Professional Data, we identified 15,443 patients aged ≥66 with uterine cancer who presented with PMB. Initial place of care was categorized as: office visit to an obstetrician/gynecologist, office visit to a physician of another specialty, or emergency department (ED) visit. Multivariable regressions were used to analyze the relationship between patient characteristics, initial place of care, and stage at diagnosis.
resultsMean age of patients in the sample was 74.5 and 83.1 % were non-Hispanic White. 61.0 %, 27.8 %, and 11.2 % of patients had their first PMB claim filed from an office visit to an obstetrician/gynecologist, an office visit to a physician of another specialty, and an ED visit, respectively. Their median (10th-to-90th percentile) duration from first PMB claim to uterine cancer diagnosis was 20 (0-134), 32 (6-169), and 14 (0-92) days, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients whose first PMB claim was from an ED visit were more likely to have advanced stage cancer (e.g., adjusted OR [95 % CI] for having distant stage = 1.44 [1.16-1.80] compared to obstetrician/gynecologist visits and 1.31 [1.04-1.66] compared to other physician visits).
conclusionsInitial place of care for PMB was associated with duration to diagnosis. Patients using ED as initial place of care tended to have more advanced uterine cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.