Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41166649›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025

Assessment of temperature dynamics in pulsed field ablation with a variable-loop circular catheter: a comparative analysis of waveform configurations and irrigation rates in specimens of bovine ventricular myocardium.

Elio Zito, Moussa Mansour, Vivek Y Reddy, Amin Al-Ahmad, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Carola Gianni, J David Burkhardt, Sanghamitra Mohanty, Thanassis Papaioannou, Tushar Sharma and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Ventricular pulsed field ablation from bench to bedside: preclinical and clinical evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Impact of saline irrigation on haemolysis, silent cerebral lesion incidence, thermal dynamics, and bubble formation in pulsed field ablation with a variable-loop circular catheter.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Irrigation-dependent acute ganglionated plexus modulation during variable-loop pulsed field ablation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Observational
  5. Pre-clinical impact of higher irrigation flow rates during pulsed field ablation with a variable loop circular catheter.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Impact of catheter design on lesion dimensions during focal-bipolar pulsed field ablation: an in vitro potato model study.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elio ZitoTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
Moussa MansourHeart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3326-9973
Vivek Y ReddyDepartment of Cardiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5638-4993
Amin Al-AhmadTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8547-025X
Vincenzo Mirco La FaziaTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7548-4685
Carola GianniTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8174-7207
J David BurkhardtTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1925-5241
Sanghamitra MohantyTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5487-0728
Thanassis PapaioannouBiosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA.
Tushar SharmaBiosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA.
Luigi Di BiaseTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-4047
Andrea NataleTexas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, St David's Medical Center, 3000 N Interstate 35, Suite 700, Austin, TX 78705, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPulsed Field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal ablation modality with functional myocardial sparing. Recent evidence suggests that clinically used PFA systems may produce non-negligible thermal effects, particularly at the tissue-catheter interface, potentially increasing the risk of thrombo-embolic complications. This study sought to characterize the temperature dynamics of two PFA pulse waveforms, delivered using a variable-loop circular catheter, under different irrigation conditions. METHODS AND

resultsIn total, 132 ablations were performed on 31 bovine myocardial tissue specimens, using Sequence_1 and Sequence_2 at two different irrigation rates-4 and 30 mL/min. Maximum temperatures and their rise from baseline were measured at the tissue surface, and at 3 and 7 mm depths, across different ablation conditions. Sequence_1 at 4 mL/min produced the highest surface temperature (56.4°C [54.9-58.4]) and temperature rise (ΔT: 19.4°C [17.9-21.4]). Sequence_2 at 30 mL/min showed the most favourable thermal profile, with significantly lower surface temperatures (40.8°C [37.9-43.0], ΔT: 3.8°C [0.9-6.0], P < 0.0001). At 3 mm depth, temperature increases were reduced for all settings, but remained highest with Sequence_1 at 4 mL/min (42.5°C, ΔT: 5.5°C). At 7 mm depth, temperatures remained close to baseline. Both waveform and irrigation optimization independently and synergistically reduced tissue heating, with the Sequence_2 at 30 mL/min achieving the lowest thermal load at all depths.

conclusionThis study confirms that PFA can induce relevant thermal effects, especially at the tissue interface. However, waveform optimization and active cooling significantly mitigate these effects. Such strategies to minimize thermal effects should be implemented in clinical practice to enhance procedural safety.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersCatheter AblationHeart VentriclesMyocardiumTherapeutic IrrigationAnimalsCattleEquipment DesignTemperatureAtrial fibrillationCatheter ablationHeatingPulse field ablationVLCC

Identifiers

PMID41166649
PMCPMC12629080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.