ArticleJMIR biomedical engineering2025
Thigh-Worn Sensor for Measuring Initial and Final Contact During Gait in a Mobility Impaired Population: Validation Study.
Article in JMIR biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thigh-Worn Sensor for Measuring Initial and Final Contact During Gait in a Mobility Impaired Population: Validation Study.JMIR biomedical engineering · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adapting physical activity monitors to detect gait events (ie, at initial and final contact) has the potential to build a more personalized approach to gait rehabilitation after stroke. Meeting laboratory standards for detecting these events in impaired populations is challenging, without resorting to a multisensor solution. The Teager-Kaiser energy operator (TKEO) estimates the instantaneous energy of a signal; its enhanced sensitivity has successfully detected gait events from the acceleration signals of individuals with impaired mobility, but has not been applied to stroke. Objective: This study aimed to test the criterion validity of TKEO gait event detection (and derived spatiotemporal metrics) using data from thigh mounted physical activity monitors compared with concurrent 3D motion capture in chronic survivors of stroke. Methods: Participants with a history of stroke(n=13, mean age 59, SD 14 years), time since stroke (mean 1.5, SD 0.5 years), walking speed (mean 0.93ms-1 , SD 0.38 m/s) performed two 10m walks at their comfortable speed, while wearing two ActivPAL 4+ (AP4) sensors (anterior of both thighs) and LED cluster markers on the pelvis and ankles which were tracked by a motion capture system. The TKEO signal processing technique was then used to extract gait events (initial and final contact) and calculate stance durations which were compared with motion capture data. Results: There was very good agreement between the AP4 and motion capture data for stance duration (AP4 0.85s, motion capture system 0.88s, 95% CI of difference -0.07 to 0.13, intraclass correlation coefficient [3,1]=0.79). Conclusions: The TKEO method for gait event detection using AP4 data provides stance time durations that are comparable with laboratory-based systems in a population with chronic stroke. Providing accurate stance time durations from wearable sensors could extend gait training out of clinical environments. Limitations include ecological and external validity. Future work should confirm findings with a larger sample of participants with a history of stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.