Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41166380›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Enhanced audience sentiment analysis in IoT-integrated metaverse media communication.

Hongtao Wang, Shan Wang, Yijun Lu, Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin, Jiandong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hongtao WangCollege of Music and Dance, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Shan WangCollege of Music and Dance, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Yijun LuSchool of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, China.
Nikolai Ivanovich VatinPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Jiandong HuangPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9658-241X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convergence of Metaverse technologies, Internet of Things (IoT), and consumer electronics has given rise to an imperative need for scalable, real-time sentiment analysis that can process heterogeneous, high-velocity media flows. The traditional approaches tend to fail in preserving the contextual, emotional, and temporal dynamism that pervades cross-platform settings. For these shortcomings, this work proposes a deep learning-based framework for sentiment analysis that integrates IoT-enabled consumer devices and Metaverse media interactions seamlessly. The overall BG-Hybrid model, fundamentally, blends BERT-led bidirectional encoding and GPT-based generative modeling to attain subtle emotion detection and context-aware comprehending. The five interconnected modules constituting the architecture include (i) multi-source data collection using RESTful APIs; (ii) weighted preprocessing pipelines using tokenization, lemmatization, and normalization; (iii) Adam algorithm-optimized model training and cross-entropy loss minimization-based training; (iv) adaptive real-time processing using dynamic window segmentation; and (v) an ongoing refinement loop using continuous user inputs, triggered by a feedback mechanism. Predictive thresholding is employed to manage temporal sentiment variations, and anomaly detection ensures data trustworthiness. Experimental analyses on Twitter Sentiment140 and Amazon Reviews datasets validate the effectiveness of the system, obtaining 94.5% accuracy, 91.5% F1-score, an average response latency of 250 ms, and proved scalability exceeding 91.5%.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmotionsInternet of ThingsAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansSocial Media

Identifiers

PMID41166380
PMCPMC12574914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.