SynthesisJournal of Huntington's disease2026
Emotion recognition in people with Huntington's disease: A comprehensive systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of Huntington's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations Between Lifetime Stressor Exposure and Externalizing Problems in Youth at Risk for Huntington Disease.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Accelerated prefrontal intermittent theta-burst stimulation in Huntington's disease: a within-subject study of domain-specific behavioral and event-related potential changes.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Additive effect of patient anosognosia and theory of mind deficit on dementia caregiver distress.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundDeficits of emotion recognition have received increasing attention in people with Huntington's disease (HD) in the three decades since the discovery of the HD gene. However, the characterisation of such deficits across different disease stages, types of stimuli, and sensory modalities is currently unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the evidence on emotion recognition deficits in HD gene carriers (both manifest and premanifest) over the three decades since definitive gene testing.MethodA systematic review was carried out from January 1993 to January 2025 across MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Academic Search Complete, and CINAHL (PROSPERO registration: CRD42023398649).ResultsFrom 9735 initial citations, 59 studies were eventually included. In manifest HD, facial recognition of negative emotions such as anger, fear, disgust, and sadness was consistently impaired, whereas happiness and neutral expressions were generally spared. A few auditory studies showed consistent deficits for disgust, fear, and anger, while happiness and sadness appeared less affected. Only preliminary evidence is currently available for deficits involving body language, visual and written vignettes, videos, and olfactory and gustatory tasks. Although sparser, the evidence for premanifest HD suggests that some individuals may develop significant recognition difficulties prior to motor onset, particularly due to early frontostriatal deterioration and white matter disruption.ConclusionsImpairments of facial recognition of negative emotions are reported consistently in manifest HD, while only preliminary results are available for other modalities. The evidence involving premanifest HD is much sparser. Key implications for clinical practice and future research are outlined and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.