ArticlePloS one2025
A retrospective analysis of specialty match rate and gender trends in Canadian residency applications (2019-2024).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study examines Canadian medical graduate (CMG) match outcomes from 2019 to 2024, focusing on applicant numbers, gender distribution, and match success.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted using publicly available data from the CaRMS match reports. Specialty-specific application numbers and first-choice match rates were extracted. Match rates were calculated as the number of matriculates divided by the number of applicants, while competitiveness was determined by the number of first-choice applications per available position. Specialties were categorized into clinical, surgical, and diagnostic disciplines for trend analysis.
resultsFrom 2019 to 2024, CMG applicants decreased slightly from 5380 to 5346, while the total quota increased from 2800 to 2918. Family medicine saw a significant decrease in applications (r² = -0.849, p = 0.03), while anesthesiology had a significant increase (r² = 0.950, p < 0.01). Diagnostic disciplines like neuropathology decreased significantly (r² = -0.887, p = 0.02), while diagnostic radiology increased (r² = 0.842, p = 0.03). Surgical disciplines, including plastic surgery, had steady increases, with vascular surgery doubling its applications by 2023. Female applicants increased in clinical and surgical specialties but decreased in diagnostics. Match rates improved in family medicine (r2 = 0.964, p < 0.01), medical genetics (r2 = 0.817, p = 0.04), psychiatry (r2 = 0.839, p = 0.04), public health (r2 = 0.939, p < 0.01), and diagnostic and clinical pathology (r2 = 0.850, p = 0.03), while diagnostic radiology (r2 = -0.825, p = 0.04) declined. Female applicants had higher match rates in ophthalmology and pediatric neurology, while males led in orthopedic surgery.
conclusionShifts in Canadian residency match trends from 2019 to 2024 may reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and evolving societal priorities. Ongoing monitoring of these trends is essential to ensure alignment with healthcare needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.