ArticlePloS one2025
Headwaters to valley: Water quality in rivers transitioning from forest to agricultural bottomland.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many waterways flow out of forestlands, which tend to maintain higher water quality, into agricultural lands, which tend to degrade water quality. The roles of land cover in impacting key water quality parameters (phosphorus, nitrogen, total suspended solids, bacteria, and conductivity) were investigated for the watershed of the North and South Fork of the Shenandoah River, Virginia. This area has a particularly sharp boundary between heavily forested and heavily agricultural regions. Two datasets were analyzed: 1) a large number of datapoints spanning a 20-year range in the Water Quality Portal (WQP) database, and 2) transects along three representative rivers systems over the span of a 4-year period. All parameters trended better in forested regions than agricultural regions. This was particularly true for nitrogen and conductivity; phosphorus, TSS and bacteria showed more local variability, especially in the agricultural region. Periods of high flow increased phosphorus, sediment and bacteria concentrations, and decreased conductivity, but not when drainage basin forest cover was less than 80%. Transects showed that waterways flowing out of forestland maintained higher water quality for approximately the first 8 km in agricultural land. Both transect and WQP data indicated higher water quality when the percent of forested land cover in a drainage basin was about 70-80%. Thus, forestland does mitigate the impacts of agriculture on water quality to some degree, but this effect rapidly diminishes as forest cover of the watershed lessens. Furthermore, forests themselves have degraded water quality at certain times and places; for instance, nutrients level were in the medium to high stress level for aquatic life in approximately 15% of samples. This study illustrates general trends of land cover effects on water quality, while also highlighting both site-specific variability, and the dynamics of water quality as water flows out of forested areas into agricultural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.