Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41166322›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Newborn screening for sickle cell disease in Caluquembe, southwestern Angola, 2024-2025.

Jasmine J Su, Vasco S Kupua, Daniel Cummings, Kathryn H Jacobsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasmine J SuHospital Evangélico de Caluquembe, Caluquembe, Angola.
Vasco S KupuaHospital Evangélico de Caluquembe, Caluquembe, Angola.
Daniel CummingsHospital Evangélico de Caluquembe, Caluquembe, Angola.
Kathryn H JacobsenDepartment of Health Studies, University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4198-6246

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAngola is one of the countries with the highest prevalence of sickle cell disease (SCD). Neonatal SCD testing is recommended by the Angolan government, but it is not routinely performed. Nearly all previous studies of SCD have been conducted in cities. We implemented a neonatal SCD screening program in a referral hospital in Huíla province to examine the epidemiology of SCD in this Umbundu-speaking population and to demonstrate the feasibility of using point-of-care (POC) tests for SCD in a rural setting.

methodsBetween October 2024 and February 2025, we screened 353 infants less than one month old at Hospital Evangélico de Caluquembe for the hemoglobin S (HbS) gene using HemoTypeSC rapid diagnostic tests. We also reviewed all pediatric outpatient visits from 2024 to identify newly-diagnosed SCD cases.

resultsTwenty-one (6.0%) of the 353 neonates had sickle cell trait (HbAS); none had SCD (HbSS). The outpatient register review identified 26 incident cases of SCD.

conclusionsThe prevalence of HbS is lower in Caluquembe than in Luanda and Cabinda, but the combined results of our newborn screening and pediatric records provide evidence that there is a burden of disease from SCD in Caluquembe and the surrounding areas. Sickle cell screening and treatment programs should be available in all high-burden areas, not just large cities. The per-test costs may still be too expensive for universal newborn screening to be scaled up nationwide, but our pilot study demonstrates that POC tests can be a cost-effective method that yields immediate results.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellNeonatal ScreeningAngolaFemaleHemoglobin, SickleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePoint-of-Care TestingPrevalenceHemoglobin, Sickle

Identifiers

PMID41166322
PMCPMC12574841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.