ArticlePloS one2025
Female sexual agency and frequent extra-pair copulations, but no extra-pair paternity, in Nazca boobies (Sula granti).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extra-pair copulations (EPCs) are the poorly known antecedents of extra-pair fertilizations (EPFs) in birds. EPFs occur in most bird species that have been examined, but sexual conflict will generally reward females hiding their EPCs from males attempting to protect their paternity. EPCs will be difficult for researchers to document, and necessarily underestimated, in that case. We measured EPC behaviors and EPF frequency in a colonial seabird, the Nazca booby Sula granti, in which all copulations occur in a visually open setting with numerous possible copulatory partners readily available. Females are larger and more physically powerful than males, and are the numerically limiting sex, perhaps limiting options for males to control females. We found that all copulations were voluntary, and females' sexual activities were wholly unconstrained by male coercion. Most females had multiple copulatory partners in the weeks preceding egg-laying. Despite the commonness of EPC, EPFs did not occur. The different schedules of EPC and within-pair copulation (WPC) provided a sufficient explanation for this outcome: during the ovulation window days before laying, WPC rate increased and EPC rate approached zero. To our knowledge, this is the first robust evidence of complete sexual agency in a female bird aside from lek-mating species, contributing a valuable exemplar to the literature on sexual conflict over reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.