ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Dental age prediction from panoramic radiographs using machine learning techniques.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age estimation through mandibular radiomic attributes in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Third Molar Segmentation Performance Across Dental Developmental Stages and the 18-Year Age Threshold Using Deep Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- First-stage assessment of AI-based anatomical measurement accuracy for the Cameriere European dental age estimation method.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- A Pilot Study on AI-Driven Age Estimation and Sex Determination in Greek Individuals.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Exploratory Analysis of Dental Age Differences in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Using the Demirjian Method.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental age (DA) estimation is a key diagnostic tool in pediatric dentistry, particularly when birth records are unavailable or unreliable. It guides decisions on growth assessment, orthodontic planning, and timing of interventions such as space maintenance or extractions. Unlike skeletal maturity, dental development is less affected by nutritional and environmental factors, making it a reliable marker of biological age. Conventional methods require expert interpretation and are prone to variability. There is growing interest in automated, objective approaches to streamline this process and enhance clinical utility. A total of 550 panoramic radiographs from children aged 3-14 years were labeled into 11 dental age groups based on the AAPD reference chart by two experienced pediatric dentists. Images with poor quality were excluded. The dataset was divided into training (80%) and validation (20%) sets, with data augmentation applied to the training set. The YOLOv11n-cls model, consisting of 86 layers and 1.54 million parameters, was trained for 30 epochs using the Ultralytics engine and AdamW optimizer. Model performance was evaluated using Top-1 and Top-5 accuracy on the validation set and tested on an independent set of 203 images. Grad-CAM was used for model interpretability. The model achieved 92.6% Top-1 and 99.5% Top-5 accuracy on the validation set. Performance on the test set remained high, with most misclassifications occurring between adjacent age groups. Grad-CAM visualizations showed attention to clinically relevant areas like erupting molars and root development. The findings support the high performance of DL, through YOLOv11 for pediatric age prediction. The AI tool enabled fast, accurate, and interpretable DA classification, making it a strong candidate for clinical integration as an adjunct tool into pediatric dental practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.