ArticleEuropean journal of public health2025
A scoping review of multiple deprivation indices in Europe.
Article in European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The 'social gradient' in primary liver cancer in France: A national observational study.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple deprivation indices (MDIs) measure community-level deprivation using various socio-economic indicators such as education level, unemployment rate, or family structure. With their growing use across Europe and the need to evaluate health impacts on vulnerable populations, this scoping review provides an overview of MDIs in the region. Insights into their construction methods will help provide guidance to researchers in developing future indices. This scoping review was conducted as part of the four-year research project funded through EU Horizon Europe-Burden of disease-based methods for estimating the socio-economic cost of environmental stressors (BEST-COST). We searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science using terms covering deprivation in Europe. Articles meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed to identify MDIs and their methodologies. Those including a health indicator were excluded from the study. From 163 articles meeting our inclusion criteria, 18 MDIs were identified. The number of underlying indicators ranged from 4 to 22 across MDIs. Most indices were built for small geographical areas, such as municipalities, districts, or census tracts. Ten indices applied weights derived from statistical methods such as principal components analysis, while the other eight applied equal weights and calculated the index as a simple arithmetic sum or mean composite score. The review highlights high variability in MDI methodologies and emphasizes that aligning MDI selection with the context and objectives of a study. Furthermore, due to the vast cultural and geographical diversity across European countries, developing a Europe-wide index requires careful consideration of the methodologies to be employed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.