ArticleNutrition and health2026
Nutrition and integrated healthcare knowledge, attitudes, and prospective practices among healthcare students: A theoretical model survey analysis.
Article in Nutrition and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundThe understanding, appreciation, and application of integrated healthcare by health professional students can shape future health promotion and intervention strategies. This involves blending nutrition, lifestyle, and conventional medical approaches from educational curricula to the professional practice arena.AimsTo assess targeted healthcare students from three institutions for associations between demographics and survey parameters of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding nutrition and integrated healthcare approaches, and to evaluate students' prospects for integrating lifestyle-based and conventional healthcare approaches, within the context of the Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) model.MethodsSurvey questions and responses based on a previously validated electronic questionnaire were used to evaluate university-level healthcare students enrolled in the nutrition (n = 92) and nursing (n = 195) disciplines. Demographic data were analyzed alongside scored items assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, Dunn-Bonferroni tests, Spearman's rho, and partial correlations were conducted.ResultsMost students demonstrated high overall knowledge (74%), attitude (93%), and practice (84%) scores. However, significant differences (p < 0.05) in the knowledge scores were observed across institutions, academic levels, and disciplines. Although relatively weak, knowledge had a significant and positive relationship with attitude (rho = 0.263, < 0.001), but not with practice. The strength of relationships was moderated by controlling for socio-demographic factors such as specific degree/discipline, institutional and environmental context, race, religion, and age.ConclusionThe findings of this study highlight the benefits of using KAP-based learning outcomes for healthcare training programs and demonstrate its relevance in informing tailored educational strategies and clinical interventions and policy initiatives that support integrated healthcare approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.