ReviewShock (Augusta, Ga.)2026
Optimization of Preclinical Rodent Research Models of Human Shock: Part One Intra-Abdominal Sepsis.
Review in Shock (Augusta, Ga.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Tissue Inhibitors in Sepsis Pathogenesis.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Animal models of critical illness in the Asia-Pacific region: current practices, shared challenges, and future directions.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preclinical models using animals are crucial for medical advancements despite their limitations and criticisms. Critical illnesses like sepsis, trauma, and burns remain huge causes of morbidity and mortality despite medical advances, and human studies may not always be feasible. In this part one of two reviews about animal models for critical illness, we discuss sepsis and the considerations one should take to optimize the rodent sepsis model. There are multiple models of sepsis used, each with advantages and disadvantages, and they can be modified to reflect how patients are treated in the hospital, including intensive care unit care. Patient factors such as age, sex, and comorbidities are important considerations given the different responses to sepsis. Aspects of sepsis that our patients encounter, including muscle and neurocognitive dysfunction, can be modeled to try and improve those aspects of outcomes. Choosing the right models for the question one is asking and optimizing that model is key to recapitulate the human condition to make animal models more translatable to humans. In other words, we suggest that, in lieu of abandoning animal models of sepsis, we seek to enhance translatability to the human condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.