Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41166040›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2025

Perioperative Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Sarafina Urenna Otis, Giuseppe Luigi Banna, Akash Maniam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarafina Urenna OtisMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, England.
Giuseppe Luigi BannaPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, England.
Akash ManiamPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, England. akash.maniam@porthosp.nhs.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review explores the use of perioperative immunotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), highlighting key recent developments in the field, questions that remain, and perspectives on their future use. RECENT

findingsImmunotherapy has seen a recent expansion of its use to earlier-stage settings, previously limited to advanced/metastatic cancers, with widespread regulatory adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the perioperative setting of resectable early-stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC. However, questions remain regarding the efficacy of different drug regimens, their duration and scheduling, and, in particular, combinations with other therapies. The use of ICIs alongside molecularly targeted therapy has prompted well-evidenced concerns around toxicity and efficacy, with focus shifting to alternative strategies. Promising findings are seen with the revolutionary use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in various cancer fields, prompting growing interest and a number of trials investigating their use, including combined with immunotherapy, within lung cancer. While promising as a therapy, the full potential of perioperative immunotherapy still remains to be realised, to be aided by further research into optimisation of treatment regimens and combinatorial strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyLung NeoplasmsHumansPerioperative CareImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAntibody drug conjugatesEarly-stageImmune checkpoint inhibitorsImmunotherapyNSCLCPerioperative

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.