ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Implementation of Community Participation Practices in Coordinated Specialty Care: Insights from a Qualitative Study.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community participation is critical for health, particularly during young adulthood. Coordinated Specialty Care (CSC) programs for young adults with early psychosis aim to promote community participation; however, research on practices beyond those focused on employment, education, and family relationships is limited. This qualitative study explored CSC programs' community participation practices across a broad range of areas and the factors influencing their implementation. Following a national survey, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 CSC program leaders to examine ten specific practices. Recorded responses were transcribed and qualitatively analyzed using an integrated thematic analysis approach. Findings revealed that programs implemented a range of practices, including outreach to mainstream organizations, fostering mutual support among clients, facilitating independent community participation, and providing targeted support in spirituality/religion, intimate relationships, and civic engagement activities. Effective leadership, organizational culture, and staff factors (e.g., knowledge, skills, supportive attitudes and behaviors) emerged as key facilitators, while primary barriers included limited resources, staff challenges (e.g., lack of training), and environmental challenges (e.g., stigma, rural settings). Client-level factors, such as motivation and interference from symptoms, and the perceived effectiveness and acceptability of various practices, also impacted implementation. Recommendations include enhancing leadership buy-in, staff training, and creative resource use to overcome barriers and sustain community participation efforts. This study highlights variability across CSC programs and provides actionable strategies to strengthen community participation practices for young adults with early psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.