ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
Mindset: Cognitive Remediation Intervention to Facilitate Education for Young Adults with a Psychotic Spectrum Disorder - A Pilot Feasibility Study with Patient Experiences.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Young adults with psychotic-spectrum disorder have lower odds of attaining educational goals, partly due to cognitive problems. Cognitive remediation (CR) could improve cognitive- and potentially academic functioning. The current study examined an adapted CR-intervention 'Mindset' aimed at academic functioning for people with a psychotic-spectrum disorder in secondary education. Pilot-feasibility study of Mindset including the experience of nine participants with psychotic-spectrum disorder who received Mindset and six CR trainers. Post-CR interviews with participants and trainers were subjected to qualitative evaluation. Furthermore, preliminary results from pre- to post-CR changes on the College Self-Efficacy Inventory (CSEI), Cognitive Problems and Strategies Assessment (CPSA) and Multidimensional Students' Life Satisfaction Scale (MSLSS) are presented using Reliable Change Index (RCI) and effect-sizes (Cohen's d). Qualitative evaluation showed that overall experience with Mindset was positive for participants and trainers. Mindset was not experienced as too difficult and aligned well with education. However, tailoring to the individual is required. Effect sizes in change from pre- to post-CR were small for school satisfaction (d = 0.25) and self-reported cognitive problems (d = 0.12), small to medium for increases in self-efficacy (d = 0.49) and large for increases in strategy use (d = 3.58). Feasibility of Mindset was good in terms of adaptation and expansion, implementation and limited efficacy. However, concerning acceptability, drop-out prior to Mindset was high and Mindset needs adjustment in terms of individual tailoring and language. Future studies have to attest to its efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41166009What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.