ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Surgeon experience and patient selection influence the learning curve in robotic inguinal hernia repair.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Learning curve in robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Short-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic TAPP for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the global landscape of robot-assisted hernia surgery research: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Mapping the scientific landscape of robotic hernia repair: a bibliometric and topic modeling analysis of thematic transitions.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair offers ergonomic and technical advantages over conventional approaches, but its adoption requires a learning process influenced by multiple factors. While prior surgical experience is a known determinant of performance, the impact of patient selection and hernia complexity on the learning trajectory remains insufficiently explored. This retrospective single-center study evaluated the learning curves of three surgeons with varying levels of prior open, laparoscopic, and robotic experience, who performed robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (rTAPP) inguinal hernia repairs between September 2018 and May 2023. Operative time was plotted against sequential case number to identify distinct phases in each surgeon's learning curve. Associations between clinical variables and curve phases were analyzed statistically. Additional descriptive analyses were performed for unilateral and bilateral hernias. A total of 110 consecutive patients were included. Surgeons A and B (more experienced) demonstrated two-phase learning curves, while Surgeon C (less experienced) exhibited a four-phase curve with greater variability in operative time. Differences in patient and hernia complexity across phases were most notable in Surgeon C's cases. The learning curve for rTAPP is modulated not only by prior surgical experience, but also by the evolving complexity of patient selection during training. These findings support the implementation of structured training programs that prioritize progressive case selection, beginning with less complex hernias, to ensure safe and efficient skill acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.