ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Assessing the influence of gestational trophoblastic disease history on IVF-ET pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a history of gestational trophoblastic disease on pregnancy outcomes in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer procedures(IVF-ET) and to utilize logistic regression to analyze potential risk factors influencing re-pregnancy outcomes among women with GTD histories undergoing IVF-ET.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study collected data from patients with a history of GTD who underwent IVF-ET at the hospital from January 2018 to January 2023. The study group comprised 27 women with a history of GTD. A control group of 54 women, matched at a 1:2 ratio, without a GTD history, was selected from those who underwent IVF-ET during the same period at the same hospital. Statistical analyses were employed to compare baseline characteristics, embryological parameters, and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups.
resultsThe study group exhibited significantly lower endometrial thickness (EMT) during the mid-luteal phase of the natural menstrual cycle, reduced EMT on the day of embryo transfer (ET), and a decreased blastocyst formation rate compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the study group had a higher number of uterine curettages prior to transfer, an increased rate of discarded embryos, and higher total sperm motility (PR + NP) in their spouses (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that a history of GTD does not significantly affect pregnancy outcomes post-IVF-ET. CONCLUSION(S): A history of GTD does not significantly influence pregnancy outcomes following IVF-ET. Therefore, patients with a GTD history and their physicians can approach the IVF-ET process with less anxiety and adopt a more positive and rational outlook.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.