Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41165973›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Flow Cytometric Seed Screening and Seed Genotyping: Methods for Detecting Reproductive Modes in Flowering Plants.

Petra Šarhanová, Ľuboš Majeský, Juraj Paule

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petra ŠarhanováFaculty of Science, Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1006-4003
Ľuboš MajeskýFaculty of Science, Department of Botany, Palacký University in Olomouc, Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8860-5703
Juraj PauleFreie Universität Berlin, ZE Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5375-7689

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry is widely used to estimate ploidy levels and genome sizes in plants and animals. It is also a common tool for determining the reproductive mode in flowering plants through flow cytometric seed screening (FCSS), which can differentiate sexual and apomictic pathways. However, FCSS has limitations, as it is not universally applicable to all apomictic taxa and cannot resolve certain reproductive pathways. These challenges can be addressed by germinating seeds and genotyping seedlings and their parents. However, this approach can be time- and space-intensive and carry other drawbacks (e.g., the ploidy level of the endosperm remains undetected). Here, we present a streamlined method that combines flow cytometry with genotyping of the same seeds. Applying both methods to a single seed enables comprehensive insights into reproductive modes, detecting various forms of apomixis and automixis, assessment of the level of selfing, regardless of the mode of reproduction mode, and identifying pollen donors in the endosperm of apomictic seeds. Each protocol-FCSS and seed genotyping-can also be used independently to determine basic reproductive modes.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryGenotyping TechniquesMagnoliopsidaSeedsAllelesApomixisEndospermParthenogenesisPloidiesPollenReproductionApomixisFCSSMode of reproductionSeed genotypingSSR-seq

Identifiers

PMID41165973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.