ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2026
Training and Use of Evidence-Based Tools in Addiction Prevention: A Comparative Analysis Between Municipal and Other Sector Prevention Professionals in Spain.
Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Proposal of a Conceptual Framework on Barriers to Addiction Prevention and Their Potential Contribution to Prevention Failure.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Addiction prevention is a strategic priority in public health, aimed at promoting effective, ethical, and evidence-based interventions. This study examines the training, knowledge, and use of evidence-based tools and quality standards among addiction prevention professionals in Spain. It identifies differences according to professional profile and explores their training needs. A non-experimental, cross-sectional design was employed, with a descriptive and exploratory approach. Data collection combined closed-ended items with a single open-ended question. A total of 623 professionals participated, categorized into Técnicos Municipales de Prevención (MAPT) and Otros Profesionales de Prevención (OPP). Descriptive and comparative statistical analyses (frequencies, percentages, and between-group comparisons) were conducted, along with qualitative content analysis of the open responses. MAPTs reported more structured training and greater familiarity with tools such as the European Prevention Curriculum (EUPC), the European Drug Prevention Quality Standards, and the Spanish Good Practice Portal (BBPP). In contrast, OPPs reported more general training deficiencies and less knowledge of these tools, although they more frequently reported using scientific sources such as the EMCDDA. Both groups showed an underutilization of key portals and a strong demand for training in planning, evaluation, and the use of technical resources. Findings reveal significant inequalities in access to specialized training and evidence-based tools. These results underscore the need to develop differentiated training pathways aligned with international quality standards and tailored to the specific roles and responsibilities of each professional profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41165966What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.