ArticleHealth economics review2025
Impact of sugar-sweetened beverages tax on obesity and obesity-related health conditions: evidence from Washington State's soft drink syrup tax.
Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Intensification, Beverage Affordability, and Food-Security Safeguards: Global Evidence from 2022-2024.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) taxes have been implemented in various regions as a public health strategy to reduce obesity and associated chronic diseases. While previous research has examined the effectiveness of these taxes, findings remain mixed regarding their impact on long-term health outcomes. This study assesses the effect of Washington State's 2009 soft drink syrup tax on obesity prevalence and related health conditions. This study mitigates selection bias and cross-border purchasing effects, providing a clear picture of the policy's effectiveness.
methodsWe employ the Synthetic Control Method (SCM) to estimate the causal impact of the syrup tax on obesity rates and obesity-related diseases using 1996-2021 data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the American Community Survey (ACS). The SCM constructs a counterfactual state to compare against Washington's post-tax obesity trends. Key outcome variables include obesity rates (Body Mass Index [BMI]
resultsOur findings indicate that Washington's syrup tax led to a significant reduction in obesity rates, decreasing by 2.2 to 4.0 percentage points relative to the synthetic control. The tax's effect was most pronounced among college graduates, males, individuals under 65, and White/Asian populations. However, the tax did not yield significant changes in diabetes, hypertension, or high cholesterol prevalence, suggesting a more limited impact on broader obesity-related health conditions.
conclusionsThe study provides evidence that an SSB tax can effectively reduce obesity rates, particularly among certain demographic groups. However, the lack of significant effects on other obesity-related diseases suggests that additional policy measures may be necessary to achieve broader public health improvements. These findings contribute to ongoing policy discussions on the role of taxation in the fight against obesity and highlight the need for targeted interventions to improve the health benefits of such policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.