Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41165930›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology reports2025

Direct-to-Consumer Erectile Dysfunction Medications: is the Convenience Worth the Cost?

Michelle K Li, Darshan P Patel, Tung-Chin Hsieh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle K LiDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. mkl247@health.ucsd.edu.
Darshan P PatelDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Tung-Chin HsiehDepartment of Urology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewErectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly prevalent disease, affecting over 24% of men in the United States. Factors such as privacy and accessibility often act as barriers to care for patients. With the emergence of telemedicine, direct-to-consumer (DTC) platforms have become popular avenues for patients to seek care. These platforms are especially attractive to patients with ED due to their promises of providing discrete and convenient care. Phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitors remain the most commonly prescribed therapy for ED. This review evaluates recent literature over the past five years to better understand the economics of PDE5 inhibitors offered through DTC platforms. RECENT

findingsStudies have shown that while DTC companies offer convenience, these medications are offered at a significantly marked up price compared to more conventional means, such as an in-person clinical visit and brick and mortar pharmacies. While DTC platforms offer a promising model for improving access to ED care, their economic trade-offs and clinical limitations must be considered. Ongoing research and transparent pricing are needed to ensure that all patients with ED can make informed choices that best meet their clinical and economic needs.

Indexed as

Erectile DysfunctionPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsHumansMaleTelemedicinePhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsCostDirect to consumer advertisingErectile dysfunctionHumansMaleSexual health

Identifiers

PMID41165930
PMCPMC12575493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.