ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Optimizing the impact of supportive cancer care digital health interventions: considerations for design, development, and evaluation.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Feasibility and preliminary effects of mhealth supportive care interventions in adults with myeloid neoplasms: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ensuring universal and equitable access to supportive cancer care is essential for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. Digital health interventions have emerged as promising tools to address barriers in supportive cancer care by enabling remote symptom management, real-time patient monitoring, behavior change support, and enhanced communication with healthcare providers. However, despite their potential, challenges remain in their design, evaluation, and implementation. Methodological concerns, fragmented stakeholder engagement, and a lack of standardized frameworks have limited their effectiveness and widespread adoption. This paper explores strategies to optimize the design, development, and evaluation of digital health interventions for supportive cancer care. It highlights the shift from traditional intervention frameworks to user-focused approaches, such as co-design, which actively involve patients and stakeholders in the design process. While these approaches enhance usability and relevance, their application remains inconsistent. Furthermore, evaluation challenges persist due to the limited use of rigorous methodologies. To advance digital health in supportive oncology, a hybrid model integrating international digital health standards with pathology-specific adaptations is proposed. This approach ensures interoperability while addressing the unique needs of supportive cancer care. Clear, actionable guidelines, co-design, and robust evaluation frameworks are critical to ensuring these interventions are accessible, effective, and sustainable in clinical practice. Addressing systemic barriers, including data security, access equity, and real-world implementation, is essential to realizing the full potential of digital health in supportive cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41165846What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.