ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: impact and interplay with HER3 expression.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Scoring in Breast Cancer: Diagnostic Agreement and Understanding Discordance.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2026Article
- HER2 Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer: Biological Basis, Clinical Implications, and Therapeutic Strategies.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) of HER2 expression and HER3 upregulation have been associated with resistance to HER2-targeted therapies. However, their predictive role in the neoadjuvant setting remains controversial. We retrospectively analyzed 59 patients with HER2-positive invasive breast carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 agents at the Agostino Gemelli University Hospital (2018-2020). HER2 ITH was assessed on pre-treatment biopsies and residual tumors (when applicable) by immunohistochemistry and SISH. HER3 expression was also evaluated using IHC and categorized as negative, low, or high. The association with pathological complete response (pCR) and event-free survival (EFS) was assessed. pCR was achieved in 49.2% of patients. HER2 ITH was present in 23.7% of biopsies and was significantly associated with a lower pCR rate (p = 0.005). In multivariate analysis, HER2 ITH (OR 0.156, p = 0.030), HER2 score (3 + vs 2 + , OR 9.63, p = 0.044), and PgR negativity (OR 0.306, p = 0.029) emerged as independent predictors of pCR. HER3 expression did not significantly correlate with pCR or EFS, although a non-significant trend toward reduced EFS was observed in HER3-high cases. HER2 ITH negatively impacts pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer and may serve as a potential predictive biomarker. HER3 expression, while not significantly associated with outcome in this cohort, warrants further investigation as a possible contributor to therapeutic resistance. Standardized assessment protocols for both markers could improve patient stratification, guide treatment intensification, and support the integration of novel targeted agents in HER2-positive breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.