Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41165777›Full record

SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2026

Artificial Intelligence Supported Analysis of Anal Sphincter and Levator Ani Muscle Using Medical Imaging Techniques: A Systematic Review.

Keke Shi, Bram Packet, Florian Ramakers, Adéla Samešová, Kobe Haenen, Jan Deprest, Helena Williams

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keke ShiDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. keke.shi@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0009-0003-8971-9299
Bram PacketDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Florian RamakersDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Adéla SamešováDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kobe HaenenDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan DeprestDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Helena WilliamsDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Cluster Urogenital Surgery, Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 12A8125NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 1S49923 N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisInjuries to the anal sphincter (AS) and levator ani muscles (LAM) are linked to pelvic floor disorders and can be assessed through medical imaging. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, is increasingly used in pelvic floor imaging to support clinicians in their diagnostic assessment. However, the quality of AI research in this domain has not been systematically evaluated. Reviewing current AI research and its applications is essential to understand its benefits, as well as its limitations and knowledge gaps.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEExplore to identify papers on AI development and/or validation for any AS or LAM-related health conditions. Reporting quality was evaluated using the AI version of the Transparent Reporting of a Multi-variable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD-AI) checklist.

resultsWe identified 40 studies: 24 using ultrasound and 16 magnetic resonance imaging. Most studies (n = 27) focused on pelvic floor disorders, followed by oncology (n = 8). AI tools often surpassed traditional methods in time efficiency and clinical acceptability. Segmentation was the most common task (n = 25), with UNet-based models dominating (n = 22). Quality assessment showed moderate adherence to reporting standards, with 31 studies meeting 50-75% of TRIPOD-AI items.

conclusionAI shows potential in assisting pelvic floor imaging, especially for segmentation tasks. However, most models are not yet ready for widespread clinical adoption. Future studies should focus on improving dataset diversity, external validation, and reporting transparency to enable safe and effective clinical translation. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023464383).

Indexed as

Anal CanalArtificial IntelligencePelvic FloorPelvic Floor DisordersFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingUltrasonographyAnal sphincterArtificial intelligenceLevator ani muscleMagnetic resonance imagingPelvic floorUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.