SynthesisInternational urogynecology journal2026
Artificial Intelligence Supported Analysis of Anal Sphincter and Levator Ani Muscle Using Medical Imaging Techniques: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for the Automated Measurement of Hiatal Dimensions.International urogynecology journal · 2026Observational
- Commentary to 'Artificial Intelligence Supported Analysis of the Anal Sphincter and Levator Ani Muscle Using Medical Imaging Techniques: A Systematic Review'.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Transperineal Ultrasound Immediately After Birth to Predict Postpartum Anorectal Dysfunction: A Prospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisInjuries to the anal sphincter (AS) and levator ani muscles (LAM) are linked to pelvic floor disorders and can be assessed through medical imaging. Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning and deep learning, is increasingly used in pelvic floor imaging to support clinicians in their diagnostic assessment. However, the quality of AI research in this domain has not been systematically evaluated. Reviewing current AI research and its applications is essential to understand its benefits, as well as its limitations and knowledge gaps.
methodsWe conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and IEEExplore to identify papers on AI development and/or validation for any AS or LAM-related health conditions. Reporting quality was evaluated using the AI version of the Transparent Reporting of a Multi-variable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD-AI) checklist.
resultsWe identified 40 studies: 24 using ultrasound and 16 magnetic resonance imaging. Most studies (n = 27) focused on pelvic floor disorders, followed by oncology (n = 8). AI tools often surpassed traditional methods in time efficiency and clinical acceptability. Segmentation was the most common task (n = 25), with UNet-based models dominating (n = 22). Quality assessment showed moderate adherence to reporting standards, with 31 studies meeting 50-75% of TRIPOD-AI items.
conclusionAI shows potential in assisting pelvic floor imaging, especially for segmentation tasks. However, most models are not yet ready for widespread clinical adoption. Future studies should focus on improving dataset diversity, external validation, and reporting transparency to enable safe and effective clinical translation. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42023464383).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41165777What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.