ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Evidence of increased risk of five psychiatric disorders due to antidepressants.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveExisting evidence suggests a close association between antidepressants (ATDs) and the increased incidence of psychiatric disorders. However, causality has yet to be confirmed. We aim to evaluate the causal relationship between ATDs and five psychiatric disorders using the Two-sample Mendelian Randomization (TSMR) method.
methodsThis study utilized TSMR analysis to explore the causal impact of ATDs on convulsion (CONV), schizophrenia (SCZ), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), substance abuse (SA), and suicide or self-harm (SOSH). The primary evaluation of causality was conducted using the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) method; supplementary validations were performed using the Weighted median, Weighted mode, and MR Egger methods. Sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out analysis, were conducted to assess potential heterogeneity and pleiotropy.
resultsThe IVW method results revealed a significant positive causal relationship between genetically predicted ATDs and CONV (OR = 1.174; 95% CI 1.038, 1.328; P = 0.011), SCZ (OR = 1.177; 95% CI 1.038, 1.335; P = 0.011), OCD (OR = 1.755; 95% CI 1.355, 2.273; P = 2.06E-05), SA (OR = 1.326; 95% CI 1.222, 1.440; P = 1.61E-11), and SOSH (OR = 1.461; 95% CI 1.394, 1.532; P = 1.71E-50). The supplementary and sensitivity analyses indicated robust and reliable findings.
conclusionOur study suggests that ATDs are potential risk factors for CONV, SCZ, OCD, SA, and SOSH. It is necessary to comprehensively evaluate both the therapeutic effects and potential risks of ATDs in clinical practice. Individualized treatment plans should be formulated for patients with CONV, SCZ, OCD, SA, and SOSH, with increased attention during the clinical use of ATDs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41165766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.