Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41165706›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Proficiency and Difficulty Scoring Tools for Finger Replantation.

Kevin C Chung, Adee Heiman, Sunitha Malay, Proficiency and Difficulty Scoring Tools for Finger Replantation (PRAISE) Study Group, Emily R Geis, Lu Wang, Alfred P Yoon, Trista M Benitez, Zihao Han, Aviram M Giladi and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Kevin C ChungSection of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Adee HeimanSection of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Sunitha MalaySection of Plastic Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Proficiency and Difficulty Scoring Tools for Finger Replantation (PRAISE) Study Group
Emily R GeisMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Lu WangMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Alfred P YoonMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Trista M BenitezMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Zihao HanMichigan Medicine, Ann Arbor.
Aviram M GiladiMedstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Isaac C FlemingMedstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Daniel J GrayMedstar Union Memorial Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nicole A ZelenskiEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael B GottschalkEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Eric R WagnerEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Karishma R DesaiEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Alessio M GriffinEmory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
S Raja SabapathyGanga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
R Raja ShanmugakrishnanGanga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Shruthi ChandrasekarGanga Hospital, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu, India.
Joshua M AdkinsonIndiana University, Indianapolis.
Robin E GardinerIndiana University, Indianapolis.
Soumen Das DeNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sandeep J SebastinNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Hima PremnadhNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jocelyn TeoNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sonu A JainThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Kara ColvellThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Phillip R RossUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Adam C ValentiUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Replantation and revascularization are among the most technically challenging surgical procedures and have varying success rates. Methods to assess surgeon skill for this complex undertaking are lacking. Objective: To examine whether a surgeon proficiency score is associated with clinical outcomes across multiple institutions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed all digit replantation and revascularization after traumatic amputations for adult patients from January 1, 2000, to August 31, 2022, at 8 medical institutions in the United States, India, and Singapore. Data were collected and analyzed from February to October 2024. Exposure: Surgeon proficiency (range, 1.0 to 7.5; higher score indicates greater proficiency) and procedure difficulty (range, -1.0 to 7.5; higher score indicates greater difficulty) scores. Each surgeon's procedures were sorted chronologically, then divided in half. Proficiency scores were calculated for each surgeon based on the difficulty and outcomes of their early procedures and validated using outcomes from their later procedures. Difficulty scores were calculated based on patient and injury characteristics. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome of interest was procedure success, defined as digit survival at 1 month after the operation. Results: Of 653 digits that were replanted or revascularized by 65 surgeons, 458 (70.1%) were successful. Mean (SD) patient age was 41.0 (15.7) years, and 571 patients (87%) were male. Difficulty scores ranged from 1.0 to 7.5, with a mean of 2.7, and were significantly higher in failed procedures than in successful procedures (mean [SD], 3.2 [1.4] vs 2.5 [1.2]; P < .001). Proficiency scores ranged from -0.37 to 4.14, with a mean of 1.40. For each 1-point increase in proficiency score, a surgeon's future success rate increased by 7.5% (95% CI, 5.5%-8.1%; P < .001). After adjusting for surgeon experience, difficulty score, and additional patient- and injury-level characteristics using mixed-effects logistic regression, greater surgeon proficiency score and lower difficulty score were associated with greater likelihood of individual procedure success (surgeon proficiency: odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.10; P = .04; difficulty: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.86; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This multi-institutional cohort study of patients who underwent digit replantation or revascularization found that surgeon proficiency score was associated with 1-month success. These findings suggest that national trauma referral networks should incorporate difficulty and proficiency scoring tools when coordinating patient transfers after traumatic digit amputation. Centers with high replant volume or those who are geographically well-positioned to become replant centers should aim to recruit and improve reimbursement for surgeons with high proficiency scores. Meanwhile, surgeons with low proficiency scores should seek out additional training to improve their skills.

Indexed as

Amputation, TraumaticClinical CompetenceFinger InjuriesFingersReplantationSurgeonsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41165706
PMCPMC12576492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.