ArticleJAMA network open2025
Surgical Volume and Outcomes of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: The routine use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains controversial. Its benefit across different patient populations is unclear. Objectives: To identify patient subgroups with the greatest or least likelihood to benefit from intraoperative TEE during CABG, stratified by hospital surgical volume. Design, Setting, and Participants: This 2-stage, matched retrospective cohort study applied target trial emulation methodologies to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) to quantify the conditional treatment effect of intraoperative TEE among subpopulations undergoing isolated CABG at low, medium, and high surgical volume hospitals. The study cohort consisted of patients aged 18 years or older who underwent isolated CABG surgery between July 1, 2014, and June 30, 2022. Data analysis was conducted from August 8, 2023, to December 15, 2024. Exposure: Receipt of an intraoperative TEE during CABG surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mortality within 30 days of surgery. Statistical analyses included multivariable logistic regression and multiple TEE vs without TEE matched comparisons stratified by surgical volume and patient subpopulations. Results: Of 1 266 055 patients who underwent isolated CABG, 963 976 (76.1%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 65.7 (10.0) years. Among these patients, 61.8% received TEE and 39.0% did not receive TEE. Intraoperative TEE use (vs without TEE) was associated with a significant survival benefit among patients treated at hospitals with low surgical volume (2.47% vs 2.94%; odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78-0.89], P < .001) and medium surgical volume (2.09% vs 2.34%; OR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.85-0.93], P < .001) but not high surgical volume (1.72% vs 1.77%; OR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.91-1.03], P = .48). Among patients who underwent isolated CABG at low and medium surgical volume hospitals, TEE provided the greatest survival benefit to subpopulations with greater than 50% (vs ≤50%) left-main coronary stenosis, 3 or more (vs <3) diseased coronaries, and (3) a preoperative inotropic requirement. Conclusions and Relevance: In isolated CABG, intraoperative TEE was associated with survival benefit at low- and medium-volume hospitals, particularly in patients with complex coronary disease or hemodynamic instability, but not at high-volume hospitals. These results highlight persistent equipoise and the need for randomized evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.