ArticleThe oncologist2025
Adjuvant treatment preferences in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: the perspective of Portuguese medical oncologists.
Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) share histological features, they differ in clinical behavior and management. Valid adjuvant options include surveillance, platinum-based chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To assess real-world practice, we conducted a survey among Portuguese medical oncologists dedicated to genitourinary malignancies, exploring their preferences for adjuvant therapy in high-risk UTUC (illustrated as pT2N1M0) across three clinical scenarios that differed by PD-L1 status and renal function. Among 34 respondents, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was the preferred regimen in cisplatin-eligible patients, regardless of PD-L1 status (94% in PD-L1-negative and 85% in PD-L1-positive tumors). In PD-L1-positive, cisplatin-ineligible patients, carboplatin plus gemcitabine was preferred (47%), followed by ICIs (44%). These findings suggest a consistent preference for platinum-based chemotherapy, likely reflecting UTUC-specific evidence from the POUT trial and apparent limited ICI benefit in this subgroup, underscoring the need for dedicated prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.