Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41165591›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2025

Adjuvant treatment preferences in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: the perspective of Portuguese medical oncologists.

Guilherme Vilhais, Mário Fontes-Sousa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guilherme VilhaisHematology and Oncology Department, CUF Oncology, Lisbon 1350-352, Portugal.ORCID 0009-0000-6464-4575
Mário Fontes-SousaHematology and Oncology Department, CUF Oncology, Lisbon 1350-352, Portugal.

Funding

CUF Academic Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder urothelial carcinoma (BUC) share histological features, they differ in clinical behavior and management. Valid adjuvant options include surveillance, platinum-based chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To assess real-world practice, we conducted a survey among Portuguese medical oncologists dedicated to genitourinary malignancies, exploring their preferences for adjuvant therapy in high-risk UTUC (illustrated as pT2N1M0) across three clinical scenarios that differed by PD-L1 status and renal function. Among 34 respondents, cisplatin plus gemcitabine was the preferred regimen in cisplatin-eligible patients, regardless of PD-L1 status (94% in PD-L1-negative and 85% in PD-L1-positive tumors). In PD-L1-positive, cisplatin-ineligible patients, carboplatin plus gemcitabine was preferred (47%), followed by ICIs (44%). These findings suggest a consistent preference for platinum-based chemotherapy, likely reflecting UTUC-specific evidence from the POUT trial and apparent limited ICI benefit in this subgroup, underscoring the need for dedicated prospective trials.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellOncologistsUrologic NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCisplatinDeoxycytidineFemaleGemcitabineHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalCisplatinDeoxycytidineGemcitabineimmune checkpoint inhibitorsplatinum-based chemotherapyupper tract urothelial carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID41165591
PMCPMC12619994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.