Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41165527›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

Acceptance in Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.

Joost Dekker, Chris Welling, Mariette Labots

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Acceptance in Patients With Cancer: A Scoping Review.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joost DekkerDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2027-0027
Chris WellingDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-7567-3989
Mariette LabotsCancer Centre Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7095-1771

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is generally perceived as a major stressor. Occasionally, patients are able to accept their diagnosis and prognosis, and it is not uncommon for patients who initially experience great distress to eventually learn to accept their disease. A deeper understanding of acceptance can enable clinicians to better support patients in achieving a more peaceful state of mind. The purpose of this literature review was to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research on acceptance in patients with cancer. RECENT

findingsStudy selection resulted in the inclusion of 54 studies. All studies except one were published after the year 2000. Acceptance was defined in terms of cognition, emotion, behavior, spiritual processes, social processes, or other terms. Acceptance focused on disease, illness, cancer, poor prognosis/imminent death, or was not specified, and was measured by interview or questionnaire. Evidence was found for a range of factors associated with acceptance.

conclusionsAcceptance is a relatively new field of research, characterized by significant heterogeneity in both its definition and focus, as well as the hypothesized determinants and outcomes. To advance this field, it is essential to develop a generally accepted definition of acceptance and to consistently specify its focus. The present scoping review provides a solid foundation for this endeavor.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalNeoplasmsHumansacceptancecancerdefinitionreviewstress

Identifiers

PMID41165527
PMCPMC12573780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.