ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2025
Neural representation of proactive and reactive inhibitory control adaptations across sensory modalities.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Response inhibition and exercise: from theory to translational practice.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inhibitory control takes multiple forms, including proactive slowing, a strategic delay of responses, and reactive inhibition, the cancelation of an initiated response. How these processes adapt across sensory modalities and their neural mechanisms remains unclear. This cross-sectional study tested whether proactive slowing and reactive inhibition are adaptable across sensory modalities and supported by shared and distinct neural adaptations. We recruited 23 athletes and 21 age-matched controls. Participants performed a choice-reaction task, requiring rapid response selection, and a stop-signal task, requiring occasional cancelation of initiated responses. Proactive slowing and reactive inhibition were assessed across visual, auditory, and somatosensory modalities. Proactive slowing was measured by anticipatory response slowing, and reactive inhibition by stop-signal reaction time. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded to examine neural processing. Athletes exhibited greater proactive slowing and reactive inhibition than controls across all modalities. ERP analyses revealed that proactive slowing was associated with greater N2 and smaller P3 amplitudes in athletes, suggesting enhanced early conflict monitoring and reduced reliance on later attentional control. Athletes showed greater N2 amplitudes for reactive inhibition, indicating superior stimulus-driven inhibition, similar to proactive slowing. These findings provide novel evidence that both proactive slowing and reactive inhibition adapt across sensory modalities, accompanied by neural changes that are partly shared (N2) and partly distinct (P3).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.