ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Intact Perceptual Interactions of Interocular Temporal Phase and Contrast Disparities in Amblyopia.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Applications of dynamic gratings in neuro-ophthalmic disorders.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Interocular temporal and contrast differences have been applied separately to improve binocular integration and treat amblyopia. However, the extent to which binocular integration in amblyopia can be improved by combining interocular differences in timing and contrast has yet to be tested. We evaluated how these parameters interact in individuals with amblyopia and in normally sighted controls. Methods: We developed an interocular flicker integration task in which a pair of dichoptic gratings flickered sinusoidally in counterphase (2 hertz [Hz], 90-degree spatial and temporal offset), producing the appearance of motion. We determined the interocular delay required for optimal integration by adding phase delays to the 90-degree phase offset (left or right eye leading, -80 degrees to +80 degrees). Delays were tested across different interocular contrast conditions: 50%-50%, 70%-30%, or 85%-15%. Amblyopic (n = 12) and control (n = 12) participants reported the perceived motion direction. Results: Both groups showed broad temporal tuning of flicker integration. Accuracy in the contrast-balanced condition was highest with no added phase delay, and Gaussian fits to the data showed peak performance at a negligible delay (-0.3 degrees). Across both groups, an 85%-15% contrast disparity reduced overall accuracy and shifted peak accuracy to a delay of 28.6 degrees in the higher contrast eye. Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that interocular temporal and contrast disparities interact similarly in normally sighted individuals and those with amblyopia. In this task, temporal delays and contrast imbalance manipulations interact predictably, such that the effects of imbalanced contrast are counteracted by a leading temporal offset for the eye with the lower contrast stimulus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.