ArticleInternational biomechanics2025
Mechanical instability of the lumbar spine following intervertebral disc injury: a comparison of two injury methods.
Article in International biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Effects of lumbar disc injury and nociception on trunk motor control during rat locomotion.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is a potential contributor to low-back pain. While experimental IVD injury models have demonstrated IVD structural changes, the early mechanical consequences remain unclear. This study aims to assess and compare the effects of two IVD injury models on lumbar spine instability and assess back musculature adaptations to IVD injury. Thirty-one adult male Wistar rats were assigned to three groups: IVD knife stab lesion (knife), IVD needle puncture (needle), and sham surgery control (control). In the knife and needle groups, L4/L5 IVDs were injured at 14 weeks of age. One to two weeks post-intervention, lumbar multifidus (MF) and medial longissimus (ML) muscles were excised, L4-L5 spinal segments were harvested for mechanical testing, and IVDs were collected for histology. The needle group exhibited lower peak stiffness, peak moment and hysteresis than controls in flexion, with no difference in lateral bending. IVD height and area did not differ between groups, but the needle group had a smaller nucleus relative to the annulus area compared to controls. Morphological changes were observed in both injury groups. The needle group showed a higher normalized ML mass, while the normalized MF mass was unchanged. In conclusion, lumbar spine instability was successfully established via IVD needle injury in the rat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.