Observational studyThe Journal of infectious diseases2026
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Clofazimine in Women With Rifampicin-resistant Tuberculosis During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period: Results From IMPAACT P1026s.
Observational study in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter Reply to "Mind the Postpartum Trough: Closing the Clofazimine Exposure Gap After Delivery in Rifampicin-Resistant Tuberculosis".The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Tuberculosis in Pregnancy: An Updated Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere are no published data on clofazimine pharmacokinetics during pregnancy, and safety data are limited. We present data from pregnant and postpartum women receiving clofazimine for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB).
methodsIMPAACT P1026s was an observational study to assess the pharmacokinetics of tuberculosis and/or antiretroviral drugs during pregnancy. Between 2017 and 2019, pregnant women receiving ≥2 second-line antituberculosis drugs in routine care were enrolled in the second or third trimester and had intensive pharmacokinetic sampling at least once during pregnancy, and 2-8 weeks postpartum. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods and compared between the antepartum and postpartum periods using geometric mean ratios (GMR) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) and the Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired data.
resultsEleven pregnant women from South Africa, 7 (64%) with HIV, were receiving clofazimine (100 mg daily) at enrollment, of which 82% received clofazimine for more than 8 weeks prior to pharmacokinetic evaluation. Nine (82%) women continued treatment postpartum. Peak plasma concentrations and area-under-the-concentration-time-curve over 12 hours were comparable to historical clofazimine pharmacokinetic data in nonpregnant women with RR-TB but were approximately 30% higher in the third trimester of pregnancy compared to the postpartum period. Eight women and 8 infants experienced at least one severe adverse event while on study but direct relatedness to clofazimine was considered unlikely.
conclusionsOverall, antepartum and postpartum clofazimine exposures were comparable to those reported in nonpregnant women with RR-TB. Exposures were lower than expected in the postpartum period, particularly compared with the third trimester of pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.