ArticleCentral European journal of public health2025
The importance of screening asymptomatic patients admitted to healthcare facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Central European journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesScreening of asymptomatic patients upon hospital admission became a key strategy to prevent nosocomial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in facilities treating immunocompromised patients. Rapid antigen tests (RATs) were widely used due to their speed, but their reliability in detecting potentially infectious individuals remained debated. In parallel, the role of immunosuppression, especially in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, as a risk factor for asymptomatic positivity and prolonged viral shedding raised additional concerns. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of rapid antigen testing compared to RT-PCR in asymptomatic patients admitted to a high-risk hospital, and the difference in SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity between asymptomatic patients with and without a history of solid organ transplantation.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed 17,086 paired RAT and RT-PCR tests collected from 11,858 asymptomatic patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital between October 2020 and October 2022. Viral load was assessed via PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values. The sensitivity and specificity of RATs were calculated using PCR as the reference (Ct < 28).
resultsRATs showed a sensitivity of 83.5% and a specificity of 99.3% in detecting patients with high viral loads (Ct < 28). False negatives occurred predominantly in cases with low viral loads (Ct ≥ 28). SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity was significantly higher in SOT patients (5.4%) than in non-transplant patients (3.2%) (p < 0.001), a difference that was consistent across viral variants.
conclusionsRATs reliably identified the majority of asymptomatic patients with high viral loads who pose a risk of in-hospital transmission. SOT recipients represent a high-risk subgroup for asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriage, underscoring the importance of rigorous admission screening protocols in specialized healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41165179What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.