ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
International recommendations for sleep and circadian research in aging and Alzheimer's disease: A Delphi consensus study.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Night-to-night rapid eye movement sleep variability: A relevant marker of early amyloid-β deposition.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Observational
- Multidimensional self-reported sleep health, cognitive decline, and risk of all-cause dementia: A population-based multi-cohort study.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Article
- International recommendations for sleep and circadian research in aging and Alzheimer's disease: A Delphi consensus study.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
- The locus coeruleus, a blue spot for early diagnosis and prognosis of Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionResearch in the field of sleep, aging, and dementia is rapidly growing. Consensus guidance is needed to facilitate high-quality research, comparability, and consistency.
methodsA modified Delphi consensus study was conducted by the Sleep and Circadian Rhythms Professional Interest Area of the International Society to Advance Alzheimer's Research and Treatment (ISTAART) and an international panel of experts to establish recommendations for future research.
resultsAfter two voting rounds, the group (1) determined by consensus the most relevant sleep and circadian features to assess in the context of aging and dementia research, (2) established recommendations on data acquisition and report for future studies, and (3) identified high-priority future directions. DISCUSSION: This expert consensus study provides guidance to develop high-quality sleep and circadian research in the context of aging and dementia. Similar recommendations will need to be established for clinical practice. HIGHLIGHTS: We report the results of an international expert consensus study. Sleep and circadian rhythms features relevant to aging and dementia were identified. Recommendations on data acquisition and reporting were established. High-priority future research directions were identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.