ReviewJournal of pain research2025
Acupuncture Therapy for Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain: A Clinically Focused Evidence Synthesis with Therapeutic Implications.
Review in Journal of pain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07612969 (Comparing the Effect of Dry Needle, Acupuncture and Sham Needling When Added to Muscle Release Technique on Knee Range of Motion, Unipedal Balance and Jump Height in Active Men), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparing the Effect of Dry Needle, Acupuncture and Sham Needling When Added to Muscle Release Technique on Knee Range of Motion, Unipedal Balance and Jump Height in Active Men: A Randomized Control Single Blinded Study
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-Guided Micro-Needle-Knife Intervention at the Deep Fascial versus Superficial Fascial Layers in Lateral Epicondylitis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Data Mining of Acupuncture Prescriptions for Lateral Epicondylitis: A Literature-Based Analysis of Acupoint Patterns and Parameters.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extremity musculoskeletal pain (EMP) is a major contributor to chronic pain and disability worldwide, often involving tendinopathies, enthesopathies, and myofascial pain syndromes. Conventional treatments such as medications, injections, and physical therapy frequently provide only partial or short-term relief. Acupuncture, widely practiced in clinical settings, has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative or adjunctive therapy. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified studies published from January 2015 to June 2024. Eligible publications included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), systematic reviews, or meta-analyses involving adults with EMP and reporting pain or function as primary outcomes. Nineteen studies (10 RCTs, 9 reviews) met the inclusion criteria and were narratively synthesized. Results: For lateral epicondylitis (LE), manual acupuncture provided short-term benefit, while dry needling demonstrated superior long-term effects. Evidence for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was insufficient, with mixed findings and high risk of bias. In patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), trigger point dry needling showed short-to-medium term pain relief, though its added value in multimodal therapy was inconsistent. For plantar heel pain syndrome (PHPS), both electroacupuncture and dry needling produced significant improvements in pain and function, with benefits sustained beyond three months. Conclusion: Acupuncture appears to be a safe, low-risk therapy for EMP, with strongest evidence for PHPS and LE, limited support for PFPS, and insufficient evidence for CTS. Clinically, acupuncture should be considered as part of comprehensive multimodal strategies, tailored to patient needs and preferences. Future research should focus on large-scale, standardized RCTs, direct comparisons between acupuncture modalities, and inclusion of regional and non-English studies to strengthen the global evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.