ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Faricimab for retinal vein occlusion: a review of current evidence and future perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Macular Leakage Resolution Is Associated with Extended Faricimab Dosing in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A BALATON/COMINO Post Hoc Analysis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Intravitreal Faricimab for Retinal Vein Occlusion: Real-World Outcomes from the Multicenter FARTURK-RVO Study in Türkiye.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Blood-Ocular Barrier Dysfunction in Uveitis: A Bidirectional Model Linking Pathogenesis, Clinical Monitoring, and Therapeutic Opportunities.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Exosomes in pancreatic islet biology and diabetes: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and potential therapeutic perspectives.Journal of molecular histology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular cause of vision loss after diabetic retinopathy and can lead to substantial visual impairment due to retinal ischemia, hemorrhage, vascular leakage, and macular edema. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is currently the first-line treatment for RVO-associated macular edema, with its efficacy confirmed by numerous large-scale randomized controlled trials. However, VEGF is not the only pathological driver in RVO. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has emerged as a key factor that contributes to disease progression by destabilizing the vascular endothelium through disruption of the Tie2 signaling pathway, increasing vascular permeability, and intensifying inflammation. Faricimab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that targets both VEGF-A and Ang-2, providing a dual mechanism of action that includes anti-permeability, anti-angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects. In both the BALATON and COMINO trials, patients with RVO achieved mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvements of approximately +17 to +19 letters, along with central subfield thickness (CST) reductions exceeding 300 μm in both treatment arms after Faricimab treatment. Compared to traditional single-target anti-VEGF agents, Faricimab has demonstrated non-inferior or even superior outcomes in visual and anatomical improvements, while also offering extended dosing intervals and reduced treatment burden. Nevertheless, its safety profile positions it mid-range among anti-VEGF therapies. This review outlines the molecular rationale, key clinical trial data, comparative efficacy and safety, and current challenges and future directions for Faricimab in RVO management, aiming to inform its clinical application in RVO and broader retinal vascular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.