Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164764›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Faricimab for retinal vein occlusion: a review of current evidence and future perspectives.

Yongjie Jing, Daming Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yongjie JingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dandong First Hospital, Dandong, China.
Daming LiDepartment of Cataract, Dalat Banner Chaoju Eye Hospital, Ordos, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular cause of vision loss after diabetic retinopathy and can lead to substantial visual impairment due to retinal ischemia, hemorrhage, vascular leakage, and macular edema. Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is currently the first-line treatment for RVO-associated macular edema, with its efficacy confirmed by numerous large-scale randomized controlled trials. However, VEGF is not the only pathological driver in RVO. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has emerged as a key factor that contributes to disease progression by destabilizing the vascular endothelium through disruption of the Tie2 signaling pathway, increasing vascular permeability, and intensifying inflammation. Faricimab is a bispecific monoclonal antibody that targets both VEGF-A and Ang-2, providing a dual mechanism of action that includes anti-permeability, anti-angiogenic, and anti-inflammatory effects. In both the BALATON and COMINO trials, patients with RVO achieved mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improvements of approximately +17 to +19 letters, along with central subfield thickness (CST) reductions exceeding 300 μm in both treatment arms after Faricimab treatment. Compared to traditional single-target anti-VEGF agents, Faricimab has demonstrated non-inferior or even superior outcomes in visual and anatomical improvements, while also offering extended dosing intervals and reduced treatment burden. Nevertheless, its safety profile positions it mid-range among anti-VEGF therapies. This review outlines the molecular rationale, key clinical trial data, comparative efficacy and safety, and current challenges and future directions for Faricimab in RVO management, aiming to inform its clinical application in RVO and broader retinal vascular disorders.

Indexed as

angiopoietin-2faricimabretinal vein occlusionreviewvascular endothelial growth factor a

Identifiers

PMID41164764
PMCPMC12558968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.