ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The relationship between Chinese medical students' learning motivation and learning engagement: a network analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association between dietary patterns and sleep quality in Chinese children and adolescents: large-scale cross-sectional network analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to elucidate the internal relationships among the dimensions of learning motivation and learning engagement in Chinese medical students by examining the network structure of these constructs and exploring potential differences under different training models. Methods: A network analysis approach was adopted to analyze survey data from 499 Chinese medical students. A comprehensive network encompassing dimensions of learning motivation and learning engagement was constructed, followed by two sub-networks respectively focusing on tuition-exempt (government-funded) medical students and self-funded medical students. Comparisons were then made to highlight structural differences across these sub-networks. Results: In the overall network, "challenge" had the highest expected influence index, followed by "focusing on interpersonal competition." These two dimensions formed the central hub of the network and exerted significant influence on the network's overall structure. Comparative analyses showed that in the government-funded student network, "focusing on interpersonal competition" exhibited the highest expected influence, whereas "challenge" was most influential in the self-funded student network. Conclusion: This study offers a novel perspective for understanding medical students' learning motivation and behavioral patterns, thereby expanding research avenues in the field of medical education. The findings suggest that targeted interventions on these core dimensions can effectively enhance learning engagement among medical students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.