Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164677›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Comparative Assessment of Wire Deformation, Breakage, Frictional Resistance, and Patient Discomfort in Orthodontic Archwires: A Clinical Study.

Radhika Nair

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Radhika NairClinical Project Manager, InBrace, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Orthodontic archwires' characteristics are known to have an effect on the effectiveness, duration, and comfort of orthodontic treatment. Despite the widespread use of nickel-titanium (NiTi), SS, and TMA wires, comparative testing on wear, breakage, friction, and discomfort among patients has not been conducted. The study is still in its early stages. Aim: To check pain and deformation of patients and also for frictional resistance on various arches at the end of 6 weeks. Methodology: Across three groups (NiTi, SS, TMA), 25 patients were included in the study that evaluated the archwire deformation and frictional resistance. A sense of distress occurred at 24 h, 3 days, and 1 week. The statistical methods used were Chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Kaplan-Meier tests. Results: NiTi wires had the lowest level of deformation and breakage ( Conclusion: The results indicate that a greater number of NiTi wires are more comfortable and durable, whereas SS wire has fewer breaks and friction.

Indexed as

DeformationdiscomfortfrictionNiTiOrthodontic wiresSSTMA

Identifiers

PMID41164677
PMCPMC12564115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.