ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Masking Ability of Implant Abutment Substrates by Using Different Ceramic Restorative Systems.
Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The restoration of missing teeth through implant reconstructions represents a reliable treatment modality. The survival rates for fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) are reported to be between 89% and 94% over a 10-year period. Hence, the objective of this systematic review was to assess the masking ability of implant abutment substrates by using different ceramic restorative systems. The present review analyzed the masking ability of implant abutment substrates by using different ceramic restorative systems. This review has revised the literature search and data extraction processes of an earlier systematic review concerning the masking properties of implant abutment substrates, incorporating relevant studies published subsequently. This review has identified that monolithic ceramics must be employed judiciously in the presence of discolored implant abutments. The use of bilayer systems, specifically zirconia combined with polymer ceramics, has proven to be the most reliable method for effectively concealing discolored substrates, including PEEK and titanium. Additionally, an increase in the thickness of the restoration enhances the masking capability across all restorative materials evaluated. The variety of modern materials and techniques accessible for the production of implant-supported, all-ceramic restorations complicates the selection of the most suitable treatment approach. The market is continuously evolving, with new products being introduced alongside an extensive array of existing options. Ongoing research is focused on the development of zirconia-alumina composites that are resistant to degradation at low temperatures, particularly for use in dental implant abutments. Future advancements are expected to facilitate the production of more resilient abutments and restorations, characterized by superior quality and reduced fabrication time and costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.