Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164634›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Usefulness of Enhanced Urine Analysis in Febrile Urinary Tract Infection.

Litha Francis, Pinnaka Subba Rao, V Niranjana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Litha FrancisJunior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu, India.
Pinnaka Subba RaoAssociate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu, India.
V NiranjanaConsultant Paediatrician, Department of Paediatrics, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced urine analysis (EUA) as a rapid screening tool for early and accurate urinary tract infection (UTI) detection in paediatric patients. Methods: A total of 250 children aged 1 month to 5 years with suspected UTI were included based on specific clinical criteria. Urine samples were collected via midstream clean-catch or catheterization. Routine urine analysis, culture, dipstick tests, and EUA were performed. Result: Gram staining had the highest sensitivity and specificity, followed by EUA and dipstick test. Conclusion: EUA demonstrated high accuracy in UTI detection, proving to be a reliable rapid screening tool alongside Gram staining.

Indexed as

Feverpyuriasensitivity and specificityurinalysisurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID41164634
PMCPMC12563626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.