Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41164624›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Antarik Dhar, Arkamita Bhattacharya, Rahul Sharma, Sonali Deshmukh, Varsha Soman, Afshan Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Antarik DharDepartment of Pedodontics, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India.
Arkamita BhattacharyaSenior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics, Guru Nanak Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Rahul SharmaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Maharana Pratap Dental College and Research Centre, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sonali DeshmukhDepartment of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, VYWS Dental College and Hospital, Amravati, Maharashtra, India.
Varsha SomanDepartment Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Mazhuvenchery Specialty Dental Clinic, Aluva, Kerala, India.
Afshan KhanDepartment of Pedodontics, Azamgarh Dental College, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the wear resistance of various pediatric dental restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Cylindrical samples were prepared using six restorative materials: Glass ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified GIC, nano-ionomer, giomer, ormocer, and nanocomposite. The samples were mechanically and thermally stressed using a chewing simulator with a maximum number of 100,000 load cycles. The abrasion volume and surface roughness after the termination of the chewing simulation were calculated using a profilometer. Results: Significant differences were observed in the initial and final roughness ( Conclusion: Nanocomposites show an improved wear resistance compared to others, indicating the high potential of this material for long-lasting restorations.

Indexed as

Pediatric dentistryrestorative materialssurface roughnesswear resistance

Identifiers

PMID41164624
PMCPMC12564011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.