ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Study of Local Anesthesia Techniques for Pain Management in Mandibular Third Molar Extractions.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ensuring that after mandibular third molar extractions, patients can live life in comfort with no ill effects is a priority. Thus, the onset time, duration of action, and efficacy of relieving pain differ from one drug to another. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing mandibular third molar extractions were compared with regard to the efficacy of local anesthesia in each group receiving 2% lignocaine with adrenaline, 0.75% ropivacaine, and 0.5% bupivacaine. Various parameters were evaluated. Results: Ropivacaine exhibited a longer duration of anesthesia and superior postoperative pain control compared to lignocaine and bupivacaine ( Conclusion: Ropivacaine is more effective in managing postoperative pain and offers a longer duration of anesthesia than lignocaine making it the preferable agent for mandibular third molar extractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.