ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Assessment of Impact of Various Contraceptive Methods on Irregualrity of Menstrual Cycles: An Original Research.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Contraceptive methods are widely used, yet their impact on menstrual cycle regularity remains a topic of clinical significance. This study aims to investigate how different contraceptive methods influence menstrual cycle regularity in reproductive-age women. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 300 women, aged 18-45, categorized into three groups: oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (IUDs), and hormonal implants. Menstrual cycle regularity, defined by the number of cycles within 28-32 days, was assessed over six months. Results: Oral contraceptives resulted in the most regular cycles ( Conclusion: Oral contraceptives promote the highest regularity in menstrual cycles, followed by IUDs. Hormonal implants showed higher variability in cycle regularity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.