ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Success Rates in Single-Visit Versus Multiple-Visit Root Canal Treatments: A Prospective Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Root canal treatment (RCT) is a widely performed procedure to address dental pulp infections. However, there is still an argument between the efficacy of single-visit versus multiple-visit RCT, particularly concerning success rates, post-operative pain, and patient satisfaction. Objective: To evaluate and compare the success rates, post-operative complications, and patient satisfaction between single-visit and multiple-visit RCTs in a clinical setting. Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 100 subjects requiring an RCT. Subjects were divided into two groups: single-visit ( Results: The success rates were 85% for the single-visit group and 87% for the multiple-visit group, showing no statistically significant difference ( Conclusion: Single-visit and multiple-visit RCTs demonstrated comparable success rates at 12 months. While single-visit treatments resulted in slightly higher post-operative pain initially, they were associated with higher patient satisfaction due to convenience. Both treatment modalities are effective, and the choice should depend on patient-specific factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.