ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Prospective Evaluation of Emerging Paradigms and Evidence-Based Practices in Oral Health Outcomes: An Original Research.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Lab to Chairside: Dentists' Perception of Natural Nanomaterials and Smart Delivery Systems in Regenerative Dentistry.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The rapid advancements in nanotechnology have opened new frontiers in dentistry, particularly with the introduction of nanorobotics. Despite the promising applications of nanorobots in dental treatments, such as precision surgery and drug delivery, there is limited knowledge among dental practitioners regarding their use. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among dental practitioners to evaluate their knowledge of nanorobotics. The questionnaire covered three key areas: awareness of nanorobotics, perceived benefits, and challenges to implementation. A total of 150 dental practitioners participated in the study. Results: The majority of respondents (60%) had heard of nanorobotics, but only 30% had a clear understanding of its applications. Among those aware, 40% believed nanorobots could improve precision in dental surgeries, while 35% felt that their cost could be a significant barrier. Statistical analysis using Chi-square tests revealed significant associations between years of practice and awareness levels ( Conclusion: The findings suggest a need for targeted educational programs to enhance knowledge of nanorobotics among dental practitioners. Further research should focus on addressing cost-related concerns to facilitate widespread adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.