ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Evaluation of Solubility and Sorption of Equia Forte, GC Gold, and Traditional GIC Restorative Materials.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this research was to assess the water solubility and sorption of conventional GIC, Equia forte, and GC gold restorative materials. Materials and Methodology: Equia forte, GC gold, and traditional GIC restorative materials were used to create a total of 30 specimen discs, each measuring 5 × 6 mm. After that, they were subjected to thermocycling with solubility and sorption testing. The cylinders (10 of each material) were submerged in artificial saliva at 37°C for 20 days following the initial weight (W1), and the weights W2 and W3 were then weighed, and their solubility and sorption were examined. A statistical analysis was performed on the collected data. Result: With a significant Conclusion: Equia forte can be used as a posterior restorative material because its water sorption and solubility were noticeably higher than those of the other groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.