ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
"The Rise of At-Home Teeth Aligners: A Study on Patient Perceptions and Safety" in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of public preference for orthodontic appliances and treatment providers: a scoping review.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The emergence of at-home teeth aligners has transformed orthodontic care by offering affordable, convenient alternatives to traditional braces. However, their growing popularity raises safety concerns due to the absence of direct clinical supervision. Objective: To assess the awareness, perceptions, and experiences of adults in Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia, regarding at-home teeth aligners and evaluate their safety from the patient's perspective. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 400 adult residents of Al-Kharj using a structured bilingual questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square tests to assess associations between demographic factors and participant responses. Results: Seventy-five percent of participants had heard of at-home aligners, primarily through social media and advertisements. While cost-effectiveness (30%) and convenience (29.8%) were perceived as advantages, key concerns included lack of professional supervision (32.5%) and improper alignment risks (27.5%). Only 40% considered them a safe alternative to braces. Aligner usage (25%) was limited, with mixed satisfaction levels. No significant associations were found between gender, education, or aligner use and treatment preference. Conclusion: While awareness of at-home aligners is high, safety concerns persist. Most participants prefer traditional orthodontic care, highlighting the need for professional guidance and patient education in direct-to-consumer orthodontic models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.